TarHunter

• CDS target predictions are based on CDS datasets from Ensembl or JGI Databases.

• Degradome identification of CDS targets are based on published degradome datasets deposited in NCBI.

• Intergenic target predictions are based on Ensembl genomic sequences. Intergenic sequences are retrieved according to Ensembl genomic annotations (miRNA precursor sequences are masked to avoid being captured as targets).

• Intergenic eTM predictions are based on Ensembl intergenic sequences.

• Noncanonical target predictions are based on modified CleaveLand analysis of degradome datasets.

Select a species listed below.

FAQs

1. What's the criteria used in the degradome analysis?

Our degradome analysis was performed using CleaveLand4, based on (i) degradome category 0 or 1; (ii) Allen et al reported score <5.

2. What's the non-canonical case I and II?

Both case I and case II non-canonical sites have central (p9-p11) mismatch/bulge. Case I cleavage occurs between alignment positions 10 and 11, while case II cleavage site slightly shifts (between p9-p10 or p11-p12) on the target strand.